Comments on Part 2

comment on part 2 Х Tuesday • 9-Sep-2008 • 4:01 am Х # 112-7210
Х EAJrXfUjTBDkQrI Х XDYtStlrvFY

comment on part 2 Х Saturday • 6-Sep-2008 • 9:29 am Х # 112-7209
Х LwlaIzkTcbfgUuY Х RItVXguuabJodYce

poll response:
ХХХ polemical decency Х Has Ben exercized great care to fairly characterize Daniel's positions and arguments? Х not sure
ХХХ non-evasive Х Has Ben answered all questions that Daniel has asked? Х not sure
ХХХ relevant Х Are the points that Ben raises relevant to the debate question? Х not sure
ХХХ insightful Х Has Ben raised new, interesting, thoughtful or insightful points? Х Yes--interesting and insightful

comment on part 2 Х Thursday • 21-Aug-2008 • 2:32 pm Х # 112-7208
Х rLFvTdQUzHk Х sdZCpGyiRfmTW

comment on part 2 Х Tuesday • 15-Apr-2008 • 1:36 pm Х # 112-7207
Х ryDBmZbhX Х CiQeHNmSzAjRoob

poll response:
ХХХ polemical decency Х Has Ben exercized great care to fairly characterize Daniel's positions and arguments? Х No--Ben has distorted Daniel's views
ХХХ non-evasive Х Has Ben answered all questions that Daniel has asked? Х No--Ben evaded some of Daniel's questions
ХХХ relevant Х Are the points that Ben raises relevant to the debate question? Х not sure
ХХХ insightful Х Has Ben raised new, interesting, thoughtful or insightful points? Х not sure

comment on part 2 Х Tuesday • 2-Oct-2007 • 10:02 pm Х # 112-7206
Х t198t Х t198t

poll response:
ХХХ polemical decency Х Has Ben exercized great care to fairly characterize Daniel's positions and arguments? Х Yes--Ben has represented Daniel's views fairly
ХХХ non-evasive Х Has Ben answered all questions that Daniel has asked? Х Yes--Ben answered all of Daniel's questions
ХХХ relevant Х Are the points that Ben raises relevant to the debate question? Х Yes--Ben's points are relevant to the debate question
ХХХ insightful Х Has Ben raised new, interesting, thoughtful or insightful points? Х No--heard it all before

comment on part 2 Х Sunday • 30-Sep-2007 • 2:25 am Х # 112-7205
Х t676t Х t676t

comment on part 2 Х Wednesday • 26-Sep-2007 • 10:56 am Х # 112-7204
Х t504t Х t504t

comment on part 2 Х Monday • 4-Dec-2006 • 3:28 am Х # 112-7203
Х Radagast2072 Х Your description of sectarianism is very accurate; your analysis of it is sharp and to the point. I'm currently fighting against such trends in my own organization (Maavak Sozialisti, the Israeli branch of CWI), and your analysis stands in one line with mine.

comment on part 2 Х Monday • 14-Oct-2002 • 4:22 am Х # 112-7202
Х Dawgy Х :|

poll response:
ХХХ polemical decency Х Has Ben exercized great care to fairly characterize Daniel's positions and arguments? Х No--Ben has distorted Daniel's views
ХХХ non-evasive Х Has Ben answered all questions that Daniel has asked? Х No--Ben evaded some of Daniel's questions
ХХХ relevant Х Are the points that Ben raises relevant to the debate question? Х Yes--Ben's points are relevant to the debate question
ХХХ insightful Х Has Ben raised new, interesting, thoughtful or insightful points? Х not sure

comment on part 2 Х Sunday • 13-Oct-2002 • 12:12 am Х # 112-7201
Х test guy Х this is a test of the forum for part 2 of the debate

all posts for
this forum are
on this page

-- page 720 --

Click the vote button to vote for posts that you consider informed or thoughtful. Posts with the most votes will be put on the best page.

IMPORTANT: You can vote for as many different commentss as you want, but please,
DON'T try to stack the vote by voting multiple times for the same comments.

This microforum has been brought to you
by the principle of
TRANSPARENCY

Interactivity for this site
by the Red Team

Information refineries
for the proletarian century