This microforum brought to you
by the principle of
TRANSPARENCY

Forum 112 Anarcho-Leninist Debate on State--Comments on Part 2
Comments on Part 2

all posts for
this forum are
on this page
-- page 720 --
Click the vote button to vote for posts that you consider informed or thoughtful. Posts with the most votes will be put on the best page.
IMPORTANT: You can vote for as many different commentss as you want, but please,
DON'T try to stack the vote by voting multiple times for the same comments.

good comments

comment on part 2Tuesday • 9-Sep-2008 • 4:01 am • # 112-7210
EAJrXfUjTBDkQrIXDYtStlrvFY
good comments

comment on part 2Saturday • 6-Sep-2008 • 9:29 am • # 112-7209
LwlaIzkTcbfgUuYRItVXguuabJodYce
poll response:
••• polemical decency • Has Ben exercized great care to fairly characterize Daniel's positions and arguments?not sure
••• non-evasive • Has Ben answered all questions that Daniel has asked?not sure
••• relevant • Are the points that Ben raises relevant to the debate question?not sure
••• insightful • Has Ben raised new, interesting, thoughtful or insightful points?Yes--interesting and insightful
good comments

comment on part 2Thursday • 21-Aug-2008 • 2:32 pm • # 112-7208
rLFvTdQUzHksdZCpGyiRfmTW
good comments

comment on part 2Tuesday • 15-Apr-2008 • 1:36 pm • # 112-7207
ryDBmZbhXCiQeHNmSzAjRoob
poll response:
••• polemical decency • Has Ben exercized great care to fairly characterize Daniel's positions and arguments?No--Ben has distorted Daniel's views
••• non-evasive • Has Ben answered all questions that Daniel has asked?No--Ben evaded some of Daniel's questions
••• relevant • Are the points that Ben raises relevant to the debate question?not sure
••• insightful • Has Ben raised new, interesting, thoughtful or insightful points?not sure
good comments

comment on part 2Tuesday • 2-Oct-2007 • 10:02 pm • # 112-7206
t198tt198t
poll response:
••• polemical decency • Has Ben exercized great care to fairly characterize Daniel's positions and arguments?Yes--Ben has represented Daniel's views fairly
••• non-evasive • Has Ben answered all questions that Daniel has asked?Yes--Ben answered all of Daniel's questions
••• relevant • Are the points that Ben raises relevant to the debate question?Yes--Ben's points are relevant to the debate question
••• insightful • Has Ben raised new, interesting, thoughtful or insightful points?No--heard it all before
good comments

comment on part 2Sunday • 30-Sep-2007 • 2:25 am • # 112-7205
t676tt676t
poll response:
••• polemical decency • Has Ben exercized great care to fairly characterize Daniel's positions and arguments?Yes--Ben has represented Daniel's views fairly
••• non-evasive • Has Ben answered all questions that Daniel has asked?Yes--Ben answered all of Daniel's questions
••• relevant • Are the points that Ben raises relevant to the debate question?Yes--Ben's points are relevant to the debate question
••• insightful • Has Ben raised new, interesting, thoughtful or insightful points?No--heard it all before
good comments

comment on part 2Wednesday • 26-Sep-2007 • 10:56 am • # 112-7204
t504tt504t
poll response:
••• polemical decency • Has Ben exercized great care to fairly characterize Daniel's positions and arguments?Yes--Ben has represented Daniel's views fairly
••• non-evasive • Has Ben answered all questions that Daniel has asked?Yes--Ben answered all of Daniel's questions
••• relevant • Are the points that Ben raises relevant to the debate question?Yes--Ben's points are relevant to the debate question
••• insightful • Has Ben raised new, interesting, thoughtful or insightful points?No--heard it all before
good comments

comment on part 2Monday • 4-Dec-2006 • 3:28 am • # 112-7203
Radagast2072Your description of sectarianism is very accurate; your analysis of it is sharp and to the point. I'm currently fighting against such trends in my own organization (Maavak Sozialisti, the Israeli branch of CWI), and your analysis stands in one line with mine.
poll response:
••• polemical decency • Has Ben exercized great care to fairly characterize Daniel's positions and arguments?Yes--Ben has represented Daniel's views fairly
••• non-evasive • Has Ben answered all questions that Daniel has asked?Yes--Ben answered all of Daniel's questions
••• relevant • Are the points that Ben raises relevant to the debate question?Yes--Ben's points are relevant to the debate question
••• insightful • Has Ben raised new, interesting, thoughtful or insightful points?Yes--interesting and insightful
good comments

comment on part 2Monday • 14-Oct-2002 • 4:22 am • # 112-7202
Dawgy:|
poll response:
••• polemical decency • Has Ben exercized great care to fairly characterize Daniel's positions and arguments?No--Ben has distorted Daniel's views
••• non-evasive • Has Ben answered all questions that Daniel has asked?No--Ben evaded some of Daniel's questions
••• relevant • Are the points that Ben raises relevant to the debate question?Yes--Ben's points are relevant to the debate question
••• insightful • Has Ben raised new, interesting, thoughtful or insightful points?not sure
good comments

comment on part 2Sunday • 13-Oct-2002 • 12:12 am • # 112-7201
test guythis is a test of the forum for part 2 of the debate
poll response:
••• polemical decency • Has Ben exercized great care to fairly characterize Daniel's positions and arguments?Yes--Ben has represented Daniel's views fairly
••• non-evasive • Has Ben answered all questions that Daniel has asked?Yes--Ben answered all of Daniel's questions
••• relevant • Are the points that Ben raises relevant to the debate question?Yes--Ben's points are relevant to the debate question
••• insightful • Has Ben raised new, interesting, thoughtful or insightful points?Yes--interesting and insightful

all posts for
this forum are
on this page
-- page 720 --
Click the vote button to vote for posts that you consider informed or thoughtful. Posts with the most votes will be put on the best page.
IMPORTANT: You can vote for as many different commentss as you want, but please,
DON'T try to stack the vote by voting multiple times for the same comments.

This microforum has been brought to you
by the principle of
TRANSPARENCY

Interactivity for this site
by the Red Team


Information refineries
for the proletarian century